Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 62
  1. #1
    Difficult second album
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    723

    Default So.....buffers??

    After my last thread about my tone loss, I've ditched the Vox Wah, and in the post I've got a CAE Wah (always wanted one anyway!)

    But I think I may want to try a buffer out as well. Cany anyone suggest a decent one, not too pricey and not to big?? Not much space left on my board, even though I'm planning on getting rid of one or two pedals

    Cheers

    Keir

  2. #2
    The next big thing
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    103

    Default

    There are a few around based on the Klon buffer, such as the Fredric Effects one here - http://www.fredric.co.uk/klon-buffer-clone. A Mad Bean one is available as well I believe. Or you could go with something like the MI Audio Boost and Buff if you want extra functionality - http://www.musicradar.com/gear/all/g...55/description

    Can't say i've any personal experience of any though so i'm sure others can offer better input.

  3. #3
    Cockroaches & Keith Richards
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    31,754
    Red ones are better.

  4. #4
    Rock royalty
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    North of the Wall
    Posts
    14,508

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smudge_lad View Post
    After my last thread about my tone loss, I've ditched the Vox Wah, and in the post I've got a CAE Wah (always wanted one anyway!)

    But I think I may want to try a buffer out as well.
    You already have a buffer on your board - in the Danelectro. The only question is whether there is enough tone suck before that to make another one at the start of the chain (after the CAE wah, which ideally should come before the buffer) necessary.
    "Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand" - Homer Simpson

    http://www.theangelconversations.com

  5. #5
    Difficult second album
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    723

    Default

    I'll maybe try moving the EQ then....the only reason it's at the end, is because it's always on and up behind the M5 where I don't really need to try and get my foot to during a gig

  6. #6
    The ill-advised world music album
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,826

    Default

    After some searching I think I've identified that my MXR Microamp is buffered..

    I used to use a TU2 tuner but replaced it with a Pollytune mini, it appears the TU2 is buffered and the Pollytune isn't. the MXR is 3rd in line (guitar - Wah - Polytune - MXR) so am i still getting the benefit with it being 3rd?
    Last edited by Si.; 17th May 2012 at 07:39 PM.
    Red Sky Falling - Rocking the North East.

    http://www.redskyfalling.com

  7. #7
    Rock royalty
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    North of the Wall
    Posts
    14,508

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smudge_lad View Post
    I'll maybe try moving the EQ then....the only reason it's at the end, is because it's always on and up behind the M5 where I don't really need to try and get my foot to during a gig
    Don't move it unless you need to. You only need a buffer at the front if effects are sucking tone. If all the effects before the buffered pedal are true bypass, you probably don't need to move the buffer.

    Quote Originally Posted by Si. View Post
    After some searching I think I've identified that my MXR Microamp is buffered.
    No, it's not - unless you leave it on all the time. Worse, it's 'half' bypass, although it does have a very high input impedance so it isn't much of a tone-sucker.

    I used to use a TU2 tuner but replaced it with a Pollytune mini, it appears the TU2 is buffered and the Pollytune isn't. the MXR is 3rd in line (guitar - Wah - Polytune - MXR) so am i still getting the benefit with it being 3rd?
    If you have no other pedals on the board, you have no buffering at all when all pedals are off.
    "Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand" - Homer Simpson

    http://www.theangelconversations.com

  8. #8
    The ill-advised world music album
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,826

    Default

    Hmm.. I need a re-think then.. only other pedals (that are in the chain and not in a looper) are a TS9, Small Stone, and HT-DRIVE
    Red Sky Falling - Rocking the North East.

    http://www.redskyfalling.com

  9. #9
    Difficult second album
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    723

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ICBM View Post
    Don't move it unless you need to. You only need a buffer at the front if effects are sucking tone. If all the effects before the buffered pedal are true bypass, you probably don't need to move the buffer.
    I will wait and see how I get on with the new wah. The other reasoning behind the EQ being at the end, was so it was acting like the amp's EQ which I don't have.

    I was mucking around the other night, took all my board to pieces and ran each pedal individually through my TBP looper, bringing them in and out of the loop while playing, and I honestly couldn't hear any of them making much/any difference. However, when I took the looper out, and went straight into my amp, I noticed a difference - is it possible that the looper is faulty?

  10. #10
    Rock royalty
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    North of the Wall
    Posts
    14,508

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Si. View Post
    Hmm.. I need a re-think then.. only other pedals (that are in the chain and not in a looper) are a TS9, Small Stone, and HT-DRIVE
    In that case you're probably fine - the TS and the HT are both buffered.

    Don't over-think this - if you can't hear any tone suck, don't worry about it. If you can, you may only need to re-order your pedals (if that's possible from a sonic point of view).
    Quote Originally Posted by smudge_lad View Post
    I was mucking around the other night, took all my board to pieces and ran each pedal individually through my TBP looper, bringing them in and out of the loop while playing, and I honestly couldn't hear any of them making much/any difference. However, when I took the looper out, and went straight into my amp, I noticed a difference - is it possible that the looper is faulty?
    Not likely. What you're hearing there is the effect of two cables added together, compared to one. This is the major disadvantage (in sound terms) of true bypass.

    If you want to check that, use the shortest possible patch cable from the looper to the amp, and compare again.
    Last edited by ICBM; 18th May 2012 at 07:36 AM.
    "Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand" - Homer Simpson

    http://www.theangelconversations.com

Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast