Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21
  1. #1
    The ill-advised world music album
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    4,759

    Default Do I need to use matched power valves in a cathode-biased amp?

    Hey everyone

    I've got a Fender Excelsior here which I'm getting a lot of rattle from- MusicStore suggested I should try swapping the preamp valves as they might be microphonic (I already knew that, but wanted their blessing in case they tried to claim doing that had voided the warranty). No problem, I have several working preamp valves here.

    I figured when I was at it, I might as well swap the power amp valves, too (unless that definitely won't solve the problem). Problem is, I don't have a matched set of 6V6es- but I do have two (unmatched) JJ 6V6es that I could try.

    Far as I'm aware, the Excelsior is cathode-biased, so that means no biasing (right?). Do I need to use matched power tubes? I've heard conflicting things, and as there are several electronics gurus here whose opinions I trust, I thought I might as well ask.

    Here's the schematic (which I'm assuming is correct), if anyone wants to check it's actually cathode-biased.

    https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B94M...dlk/edit?pli=1

    Thanks very much for your help
    Last edited by Dave_Mc; 5th October 2012 at 06:05 PM.

  2. #2
    Rock royalty
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    North of the Wall
    Posts
    14,527

    Default

    Yes, cathode-biased, with a common cathode resistor which means that matched valves are a good idea.

    Reasonably well-matched valves are always a good idea really, even in fixed-bias amps with separate adjustments or in cathode-biased amps with individual resistors. Just because valves can be made to match for idle current by adjusting them individually doesn't really mean they will perform the same under signal conditions. But that depends whether 'the same' is going to give you the best sound, in a guitar amp... it might not. The most important thing about matching the valves at idle (either inherently or by separate biasing) is that it minimises hum.
    "Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand" - Homer Simpson

    http://www.theangelconversations.com

  3. #3
    The ill-advised world music album
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    4,759

    Default

    Thanks ICBM, i was hoping you'd see this. I'll not chance it (also there's a fair bit of background noise, so minimising hum would be useful).

    Follow-up bonus question- JJ or Tungsol (or something else?)? I've tried JJs, and they're quite nice, but they have a bit of a hard edge when driven that I'm not sure I like (of course, maybe all 6v6es are like that). Supposedly Tungsols are a bit creamier, which I might prefer, but I haven't tried them...
    Last edited by Dave_Mc; 5th October 2012 at 07:26 PM.

  4. #4
    Rock royalty
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    North of the Wall
    Posts
    14,527

    Default

    Just try it, the worst that can happen is that it will hum.

    I don't like JJ valves much either, although I admit they're reliable by modern valve standards. The power valves aren't as bad as the preamp valves, the ECC83s in particular are horrible (in my opinion).
    "Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand" - Homer Simpson

    http://www.theangelconversations.com

  5. #5
    The ill-advised world music album
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    4,759

    Default

    oh ok so it won't do any harm then?

    i don't mind JJs in brighter (or more marshally) amps but i'm not convinced by them in more fendery things.

  6. #6
    The comeback tour
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    northampton uk
    Posts
    7,832

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave_Mc View Post
    oh ok so it won't do any harm then?

    i don't mind JJs in brighter (or more marshally) amps but i'm not convinced by them in more fendery things.
    No, no harm. You can get a matched pair of Ruskies from Langrex for a tenner. Nocaster has used them.

    FWIW I did some tests on "matched" pairs and quartets of EL84s and EL34s a couple of years ago and found better matches OUTSIDE the sets than within them!

    Dave.

  7. #7
    The rehab years
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,735

    Default

    As stated above, it would be better to use matched valves.

    The Tungsols have a more "classic" 6V6 sound in my view when compared to the JJs.

    I like the JJ-6V6s a lot, but have had trouble with filament rattle in combos.

    NOS 6V6s are available at reasonable prices, but are a bit of a crap shoot in my opinion.

    6V6s were used in tons of gear (TVs, car radios etc), and unlike many valves, were made by virtually all the major manufacturers, and are quite inconsistent.

  8. #8
    The ill-advised world music album
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    4,759

    Default

    ^ thanks. that's what i was hoping regarding the tungsols versus the JJs- I don't particularly dislike the JJs, but they are quite aggressive-sounding.

    Quote Originally Posted by ecc83 View Post
    No, no harm. You can get a matched pair of Ruskies from Langrex for a tenner. Nocaster has used them.

    FWIW I did some tests on "matched" pairs and quartets of EL84s and EL34s a couple of years ago and found better matches OUTSIDE the sets than within them!

    Dave.
    haha, i could well believe that

    Thanks. Not sure i'll bother, though- I have new "matched" tungsol 6v6es on the way, so I might just wait until they get here. (Also to get the other "unmatched" 6V6es I'd have to open another couple of amps to get them out and I'm not sure I can be bothered when i have new ones on the way, anyway.)

    I'll try the preamp valves, though, i have a couple of JJs lying around.

    EDIT: ok, tried the preamp valves.

    rattle is cured- awesome

    Now the tremolo's not working and there's a weird blatty/farty/almost cutting out type of distortion when i really crank the thing. I'm guessing I just didn't put the valve in right or something like that.
    Last edited by Dave_Mc; 6th October 2012 at 09:20 PM.

  9. #9
    The rehab years
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Chelmsford ,Essex
    Posts
    1,507

    Default

    Just had a look at Langrex and they are still doing the "russian military" 6v6 as a matched pair for £10...! So a fiver a valve. I have some in my spares box...
    no worries

  10. #10
    Rock royalty
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    North of the Wall
    Posts
    14,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave_Mc View Post
    Now the tremolo's not working and there's a weird blatty/farty/almost cutting out type of distortion when i really crank the thing. I'm guessing I just didn't put the valve in right or something like that.
    No, but it might be a fault with one of the new valves. Swap out the power valves for the old ones first, and see if the distortion goes away. If it doesn't, replace the preamp valves one at a time with the old ones, or one of them.

    The tremolo isn't a bias-mod type so that probably rules out the power valves as the reason it isn't working, so I'm guessing it could be a preamp valve.
    Last edited by ICBM; 7th October 2012 at 09:05 AM.
    "Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand" - Homer Simpson

    http://www.theangelconversations.com

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast