Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Taylor K22 ce

  1. #1
    The next big thing
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    242

    Default Taylor K22 ce

    One of these being sold in my neck of the woods but a trawl round the interweb hasn't yielded a huge amount of info in terms of reviews or resale prices. Anyone know anything about them, positive or negative and/or have a view about fair price for a mint used one?

  2. #2
    Cockroaches & Keith Richards
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    planet grumpy c*nt
    Posts
    43,102

    Default

    well if the RRP is anything to go by £3200 + then assuming the used is likely to be 50% at least and my first comment would be - there'd going to be a hell of a lot better around for that ............(ex 614 owner)
    ......"Bertie is pretty much a zen master..................."

  3. #3
    The next big thing
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    242

    Default

    Are you anti-Taylor in general Bertie or this particular model? (FWIW the asking price is quite a bit less than that......).

  4. #4
    Cockroaches & Keith Richards
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    planet grumpy c*nt
    Posts
    43,102

    Default

    after owning two, just realistic that there are better guitars out there for the £££

    That being said, I do like the babys - great fun to play, a great 'leave it knocking about' kind of guitar - and Taylor's are a good guitar for electric players making the step to a proper guitar
    ......"Bertie is pretty much a zen master..................."

  5. #5
    The rehab years
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,155

    Default

    Taylor seem to attract the same kind of criticism as PRS; personally, I really like Taylors. The main issue seems to be their very 'different' tonality when measured again classic Martin designs.

    They tend to be brighter with a 'scooped' mid-range (this is a very broad brush-stroke description-wood combinations and body sizes make a significant difference). Every one I have played has been beautifully made and they always play really well. I will be honest and say that I only own a nylon string; my steel string is a 20 year old Martin D28. When funds allow, I would like to get a small-bodied Taylor as a contrast to my Martin. If your tonal preferences lie in Martin territory, you might not get along with Taylors. If you like the sound of Gibson acoustics, a Taylor would definitely not be for you.

    Rather like PRS, their values in the used market seem to have taken a hammering of late. This makes them either a bargain, or a risky punt, depending on whether you might end up moving the guitar on.

    Finally, Bob Taylor seems to be working hard on sustaining the supply of certain tone woods. I think he deserves credit for that...
    Last edited by richardhomer; 17th January 2013 at 08:56 PM.

  6. #6
    The next big thing
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    242

    Default

    I come within Bert's description of an electric player who's never owned a "proper" guitar. I'm ignorant about acoustic guitars and have no real tonal preferences as yet. I would like something as close to electric playability as possible without compromising the integrity of the instrument. I don't mind shelling out a decent amount but I'd prefer something that will hold its value as it could easily not be a keeper. However the one I'm looking at is available at £1200 which seems low in relation to the new price.

  7. #7
    The rehab years
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,155

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blueingreen View Post
    I come within Bert's description of an electric player who's never owned a "proper" guitar. I'm ignorant about acoustic guitars and have no real tonal preferences as yet. I would like something as close to electric playability as possible without compromising the integrity of the instrument. I don't mind shelling out a decent amount but I'd prefer something that will hold its value as it could easily not be a keeper. However the one I'm looking at is available at £1200 which seems low in relation to the new price.
    I would certainly consider a Taylor a 'proper' guitar. Something I missed out of my previous post; the record very well and 'sit' well in a complex mix.

    Bertie had a 614. The 600 series guitars have maple backs and sides and are (to my ears) excessively bright. The cedar and mahogany 500 series models sound really well balanced.

  8. #8
    The rehab years
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,185

    Default

    I'm a fairly new convert to Taylor, I love my GA4. I also fit into the electric player category, and I've always owned an acoustic but always felt very restricted on them. Taylors really are great to play, I swap between it and my electrics with no issues and even, gasp, play way up the neck and the notes still ring out. Lovely guitar.

  9. #9
    The next big thing
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    242

    Default

    Richard obviously "proper" was tongue in cheek - I'm sure I'll always be mainly an electric player and I consider all my electrics to be "proper" guitars.

    And thanks for the replies guys - does anyone know anything about this specific model?

  10. #10
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    The Eleven-Day Empire
    Posts
    26,954

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blueingreen View Post
    Richard obviously "proper" was tongue in cheek
    You've not met Bert, have you?
    Quote Originally Posted by jalapeno View Post
    Thatcher's Government was when the damage was done

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •