Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: yamaha sg's

  1. #11
    Difficult second album
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    523
    Rick 330 Jetglo, Rick 360 Fireglo.
    Yamaha SG3000S, Yamaha SG3000, Yamaha SG1500.
    Gibson SG 61 RI, Gibson Explorer 76 RI
    Taylor 414CE, EBMM Axis SS.

  2. #12
    X Factor hopeful
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Just - "wow" - your loft sounds like an amazing place sparky. I've 2 rics as well

    I have come to the conclusion that the S suffix is basically Yamaha's "not for sale in japan/export" line. There are a few clues I've realised/found (I probably watch too much 'Poirot'). But like most things I don't think it was a rule that couldn't be broken. Just think how easy it is to get a Fender Japan into UK now.

    They did sell SG 800S in 1982 (http://brochures.yokochou.com/guitar...82/en_p02.html)but then very little indeed. They are not listed in this catalogue from 1985 http://brochures.yokochou.com/guitar.../en_p1617.html by which time Yamaha had already started making the 'partscaster esque' SG models like the 1600 and 2500. The few S models referred to in http://www.vintageguitar.com/1979/yamaha-sg/ were sold in the west as lower number models (ie. Japan SG800S was a SBG500 in USA.

    Second, most are obviously lower spec. I have not seen one that I would take over its non S counterpart. At best I can't tell a difference and they look the same (3000vs3000S) but that's just from the views I have online. Lower spec would make them cheaper and more appealing to Western importers who have to pay duty et al. USA on brink of all out trade war with Japan too at this time so tariffs would have been proper high. Also, I think that the whole range was available in the west (ie NON S models) just that S was only for abroad and not domestic Japan.

    Third, the SG1000S has a narrower body than the straight 1000. But there was a model called an SG1000N. The N was to denote a narrow body and also to distinguish it from its export only cousins. http://ameblo.jp/you-gurenomachide/e...108656852.html

    This is all just total conjecture and IMHO and I don't mean to slight S models at all - SGs are ******* monsters in all forms. Hit me with any other wacky theories Even after posting this I am finding exceptions - it is a bit like trying to figure Tokai orFender Japan stuff from the 80s, models after price tags+inflation nightmares...
    Last edited by lushery; 8th February 2013 at 12:48 AM.

  3. #13
    The next big thing
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Barnsley, South Yorkshire.
    Posts
    274

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Guitarmonkey View Post
    The "S" suffix denotes the ability to Split coils using push-push switches on the tone controls.
    just as the man says,
    I've owned a few, from 200's to 2100's first class/premium mij build quality, but the 1000/2000/2100's are very heavy!
    Tokai Les Paul Standard ~ SOLD

  4. #14
    X Factor hopeful
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Well yeah, I mean I can't think of an S that doesn't split, but it's all the other differences that are negative I'm getting at. I guess what I'm interested in is why did they make S models simultaneously with non S models, both having same number. And what therefore is the difference is between 3000 and 3000S???

  5. #15
    Difficult second album
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    523

    Default

    Now my SG1500 does have coil taps......but.....I think I had these fitted as an addition when I got back in....errr.....early 80's.
    Rick 330 Jetglo, Rick 360 Fireglo.
    Yamaha SG3000S, Yamaha SG3000, Yamaha SG1500.
    Gibson SG 61 RI, Gibson Explorer 76 RI
    Taylor 414CE, EBMM Axis SS.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •