Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22
  1. #11
    The rehab years
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,355

    Default

    Maybe it's just me, but I don't like the look of them. look too small and weedy with big heads. If I was given a set they wouldn't go on any guitar of mine!
    Custom Tele • Customised JS100 • Fender Jazz V RH bass
    Status bass • Mojo strat • MIJ 62RI strat • Taylor 814CE
    Paduak 12 string Chapman stick • inflatable sex doll
    imitation wobbly breasts • cute rubber fondling ass

  2. #12
    Rock royalty
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Former British Republic Of Scotland
    Posts
    14,015

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheGuitarWeasel View Post
    Coming from an engineering standpoint they are fascinating ... but I have some reservations: the tuning shaft forms a very long 'lever' with a narrow 'base' providing stability on the back of the headstock. A reasonable blow to one of the machine buttons looks like it could rip out the screws otherwise unseat the tuner. if the tuner body had a third screw in a triangle layout, or a lug to increase it's base footprint I wouldn't be so wary. I think they'd be brilliant on an acoustic etc that didn't get rough handling, but the very fact that they have rated 'limits' to string tension shows that they are built down to a weight not for ruggedness.
    +1

    Bad design. A solution in search of a problem, that won't hold up to use in real life. Any set of guitar machineheads should be able to take the tension of any set of guitar strings. If the weight of the tuners is that important, there's something more fundamental wrong with the guitar anyway.
    "Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand" - Homer Simpson

    http://www.facebook.com/TheAngelConversations

  3. #13
    The ill-advised world music album
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,957

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrBob View Post
    Have you checked out the front mount option ? That's nuts, you don't even have to drill through the headstock !

    Mind you they're very specific about the string tension load. Is there a resource that lays out " string diameter x over scale length y tuned to pitch z =" kind of thing ?
    Yeah this is a good site http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/wikla/mu.../wwwscalc.html

    We had to do loads of these calculations on my degree for the instrument design analysis module I also will have to do some later this year for my masters degree.

  4. #14
    The ill-advised world music album
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,957

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WezV View Post
    Are they still a silly price though? And the comments about tension tolerances make me wonder
    I think he said they were either over or near £100

    It would certianly rule out some gauges of string for sure I would have to calculate it first though im a bit rusty

  5. #15
    The ill-advised world music album
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,957

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheGuitarWeasel View Post
    Coming from an engineering standpoint they are fascinating ... but I have some reservations: the tuning shaft forms a very long 'lever' with a narrow 'base' providing stability on the back of the headstock. A reasonable blow to one of the machine buttons looks like it could rip out the screws otherwise unseat the tuner. if the tuner body had a third screw in a triangle layout, or a lug to increase it's base footprint I wouldn't be so wary. I think they'd be brilliant on an acoustic etc that didn't get rough handling, but the very fact that they have rated 'limits' to string tension shows that they are built down to a weight not for ruggedness.
    Ha ha I said the same to him! If you drop the guitar and it hits the hets they are toast.

  6. #16
    The ill-advised world music album
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,957

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ICBM View Post
    +1

    Bad design. A solution in search of a problem, that won't hold up to use in real life. Any set of guitar machineheads should be able to take the tension of any set of guitar strings. If the weight of the tuners is that important, there's something more fundamental wrong with the guitar anyway.
    A lighter stronger material would be a better option, I'm sure its possible. Fair play to Gotoh for throwing some crazy designs out there though.

  7. #17
    Rock royalty
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Former British Republic Of Scotland
    Posts
    14,015

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MEhelper View Post
    A lighter stronger material would be a better option, I'm sure its possible. Fair play to Gotoh for throwing some crazy designs out there though.
    Yes, but it's only worthwhile if they are also good designs that can hold up to use in the real world. There are only a limited number of ways of reinventing a tried and tested design before you find out why they're tried and tested.

    At least they look like they'll work better than those LSR ones.
    "Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand" - Homer Simpson

    http://www.facebook.com/TheAngelConversations

  8. #18
    The ill-advised world music album
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,957

    Default

    They work within limited applications and thats no different to millions of other products and components out there in the market which have limitations. Obviously something that can do everything is better but if weight is important to you and you can guarantee that your instrument is not going to break the tension limits then they are viable.

    Maybe the next step for them is a tuner of similar weight that can take all tensions, who knows what goes on in R & D.

  9. #19
    The ill-advised world music album
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Burton On Trent
    Posts
    3,986

    Default

    regarding allparts - i have done 100's of orders with them so have experienced the 'out of stock' issue a few times

    Most times the out of stock items arrive within 2 weeks, no extra postage to pay and if its a part i want and am happy i would rather have it from allparts rather than a cheaper version from somewhere else then i see no problem waiting less than 2 weeks for it.


    I have had one order for a neck that took 3 months to arrive, it was also out of stock in the US so needed to be made. The wait was more than i wanted but still comparable with ordering a neck made to the same spec and a lot cheaper too, so not too much bother.

    Now, with the large stuff like bodies and necks, i generally check if they are in stock in the US when deciding whether to go with allparts. if its out of stock over there i will use that to decide if i am happy to wait

    generally speaking though, the service over all those orders has been excellent

    they state all of this pretty clearly in there FAQ which is linked to whenever an item is out of stock
    http://www.allparts.uk.com/backorders-c-674.html

  10. #20
    The next big thing
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    South Wales
    Posts
    201

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrBob View Post
    ...
    Mind you they're very specific about the string tension load. Is there a resource that lays out " string diameter x over scale length y tuned to pitch z =" kind of thing ?
    Quote Originally Posted by MEhelper View Post
    That site is ok if you know the string density, but that depends on the way the string is made, so you're pretty much forced to guess (unless you can very carefully weigh the string and measure its volume!)

    Daddario have a site with exact tensions for many of their strings:
    http://www.daddario.com/DAstringtensionguide.Page
    It's presumably accurate for their strings, but I suspect it would be a useful rule of thumb for most other brands too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •